<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conversation Is Essential. Listening is Optional.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fuelyourblogging.com/conversation-is-essential-listening-is-optional/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fuelyourblogging.com/conversation-is-essential-listening-is-optional/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:39:47 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Cox</title>
		<link>http://www.fuelyourblogging.com/conversation-is-essential-listening-is-optional/comment-page-1/#comment-14445</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Cox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 04:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuelyourblogging.com/?p=1405#comment-14445</guid>
		<description>Great points, Marian! I&#039;ll follow that up with a nice link to a good article I saw about &lt;a href=&quot;http://marianlibrarian.com/2010/07/19/i-love-you-commenters/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;honoring your top commenters&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great points, Marian! I&#8217;ll follow that up with a nice link to a good article I saw about <a href="http://marianlibrarian.com/2010/07/19/i-love-you-commenters/" rel="nofollow">honoring your top commenters</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marian Schembari</title>
		<link>http://www.fuelyourblogging.com/conversation-is-essential-listening-is-optional/comment-page-1/#comment-14280</link>
		<dc:creator>Marian Schembari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 15:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuelyourblogging.com/?p=1405#comment-14280</guid>
		<description>There’s this super-specific blogging community that you only understand if you’re knee-deep in the trenches. So maybe my friends don’t 100% get why I dig comments, but anyone else with a blog understands how vital they are to not only your site’s survival, but to your sanity/ego/motivation to move forward with your life.

We judge a blog entirely on its comments. I could give less of a sh*t if you get millions of readers every month, but if you’re getting 100 comments per post you are the cat’s pajamas. If you’re in PR you understand that reaching out to bloggers is important. But which bloggers do you contact? Those who are part of something bigger? The columnists for AOL? The biggies on HuffPo? Or do you go to the ones who have established their own little “cult followings”? People like The Bloggess or Marie Forleo…

To be perfectly honest, the reason I comment on blogs isn’t because people ask. From my experience, both with my own comments and seeing why other people write, here are the top reasons I comment a blog post:

* The blogger has said something I agree or disagree with strongly
* I want to congratulate someone on a new job/baby/engagement/personal success
* Something is hilarious and I want to add my own experience
* Something is so amazing I couldn’t possibly leave the website without letting the blogger know how amazing they are but am too lazy to write an email (There is a fine line. Remember that.)
* There’s some form of list, usually in advice-form, where I have something to contribute</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There’s this super-specific blogging community that you only understand if you’re knee-deep in the trenches. So maybe my friends don’t 100% get why I dig comments, but anyone else with a blog understands how vital they are to not only your site’s survival, but to your sanity/ego/motivation to move forward with your life.</p>
<p>We judge a blog entirely on its comments. I could give less of a sh*t if you get millions of readers every month, but if you’re getting 100 comments per post you are the cat’s pajamas. If you’re in PR you understand that reaching out to bloggers is important. But which bloggers do you contact? Those who are part of something bigger? The columnists for AOL? The biggies on HuffPo? Or do you go to the ones who have established their own little “cult followings”? People like The Bloggess or Marie Forleo…</p>
<p>To be perfectly honest, the reason I comment on blogs isn’t because people ask. From my experience, both with my own comments and seeing why other people write, here are the top reasons I comment a blog post:</p>
<p>* The blogger has said something I agree or disagree with strongly<br />
* I want to congratulate someone on a new job/baby/engagement/personal success<br />
* Something is hilarious and I want to add my own experience<br />
* Something is so amazing I couldn’t possibly leave the website without letting the blogger know how amazing they are but am too lazy to write an email (There is a fine line. Remember that.)<br />
* There’s some form of list, usually in advice-form, where I have something to contribute</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BestWicklessCandles</title>
		<link>http://www.fuelyourblogging.com/conversation-is-essential-listening-is-optional/comment-page-1/#comment-11395</link>
		<dc:creator>BestWicklessCandles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 14:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuelyourblogging.com/?p=1405#comment-11395</guid>
		<description>If you want to understand your people that follow your blog, you have to have comments.  In general, most people are followers, meaning their opinions on a topic are more influenced by the majority of the comments then by the author (sorry author).  A comment of &quot;I agree with so and so&quot; tells you about that person that is following your blog.  Knowing your followers, lets your write better articles they will be interested in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to understand your people that follow your blog, you have to have comments.  In general, most people are followers, meaning their opinions on a topic are more influenced by the majority of the comments then by the author (sorry author).  A comment of &#8220;I agree with so and so&#8221; tells you about that person that is following your blog.  Knowing your followers, lets your write better articles they will be interested in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Cox</title>
		<link>http://www.fuelyourblogging.com/conversation-is-essential-listening-is-optional/comment-page-1/#comment-4277</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Cox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 23:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuelyourblogging.com/?p=1405#comment-4277</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a pretty good analogy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a pretty good analogy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergiu Naslau</title>
		<link>http://www.fuelyourblogging.com/conversation-is-essential-listening-is-optional/comment-page-1/#comment-4271</link>
		<dc:creator>Sergiu Naslau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuelyourblogging.com/?p=1405#comment-4271</guid>
		<description>why stop the conversation? why limit the potential of a blog to only the information offered by the article? it&#039;s like saying : &quot;feedback has no value&quot;, which is stupid! Like you said: &quot;Only when we understand our readers, clients, consumers, or fans can we rightfully expect to garner their full attention when we speak.&quot; 
Blogging without comments is like a bad marriage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why stop the conversation? why limit the potential of a blog to only the information offered by the article? it&#8217;s like saying : &#8220;feedback has no value&#8221;, which is stupid! Like you said: &#8220;Only when we understand our readers, clients, consumers, or fans can we rightfully expect to garner their full attention when we speak.&#8221;<br />
Blogging without comments is like a bad marriage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jewelry Secrets</title>
		<link>http://www.fuelyourblogging.com/conversation-is-essential-listening-is-optional/comment-page-1/#comment-3997</link>
		<dc:creator>Jewelry Secrets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 04:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuelyourblogging.com/?p=1405#comment-3997</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the reply. If only I had known this 3 years ago things might have turned out different. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the reply. If only I had known this 3 years ago things might have turned out different. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChristopherR2D2</title>
		<link>http://www.fuelyourblogging.com/conversation-is-essential-listening-is-optional/comment-page-1/#comment-3606</link>
		<dc:creator>ChristopherR2D2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 00:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuelyourblogging.com/?p=1405#comment-3606</guid>
		<description>They claim to play fair -- and I believe &#039;em. 

But playing fair means they, too, can tweak the codes of the sites they own ... including youtube, blogger, and other entities they umbrella -- all in order to rank better with their own search algorithm.

You might imagine just how well they&#039;re sites will rank when they optimize them with the magical Google-SEO code everyone&#039;s after.

They&#039;re the best when it comes to optimizing their sites, because they&#039;re optimizing it for themselves!

Too bad we all can&#039;t walk down the hall and ask Matt Cutts for a little SEO.

Haha ... it&#039;s all so silly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They claim to play fair &#8212; and I believe &#8216;em. </p>
<p>But playing fair means they, too, can tweak the codes of the sites they own &#8230; including youtube, blogger, and other entities they umbrella &#8212; all in order to rank better with their own search algorithm.</p>
<p>You might imagine just how well they&#8217;re sites will rank when they optimize them with the magical Google-SEO code everyone&#8217;s after.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re the best when it comes to optimizing their sites, because they&#8217;re optimizing it for themselves!</p>
<p>Too bad we all can&#8217;t walk down the hall and ask Matt Cutts for a little SEO.</p>
<p>Haha &#8230; it&#8217;s all so silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oh the Interwebs! Adapt or Go Extinct &#124; Fuel Your Blogging</title>
		<link>http://www.fuelyourblogging.com/conversation-is-essential-listening-is-optional/comment-page-1/#comment-3580</link>
		<dc:creator>Oh the Interwebs! Adapt or Go Extinct &#124; Fuel Your Blogging</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuelyourblogging.com/?p=1405#comment-3580</guid>
		<description>[...] excerpted from a comment left on our last post about conversation being essential, but listening being optional (tongue-in-cheek title). It was left by Lisa Kribs, Editor over at Fuel Your Branding, but it was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] excerpted from a comment left on our last post about conversation being essential, but listening being optional (tongue-in-cheek title). It was left by Lisa Kribs, Editor over at Fuel Your Branding, but it was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Cox</title>
		<link>http://www.fuelyourblogging.com/conversation-is-essential-listening-is-optional/comment-page-1/#comment-3579</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Cox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuelyourblogging.com/?p=1405#comment-3579</guid>
		<description>Sara, I agree with you... ;)

Really, you&#039;re right. In fact, I was conversing with another blogger via video chat one day and he stated a long and profound idea. I replied with, &quot;Good point.&quot; Being funny, he asked, &quot;Did I just get a comment reply from you?&quot; It&#039;s too typical to say &quot;nice post.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sara, I agree with you&#8230; ;)</p>
<p>Really, you&#8217;re right. In fact, I was conversing with another blogger via video chat one day and he stated a long and profound idea. I replied with, &#8220;Good point.&#8221; Being funny, he asked, &#8220;Did I just get a comment reply from you?&#8221; It&#8217;s too typical to say &#8220;nice post.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Cox</title>
		<link>http://www.fuelyourblogging.com/conversation-is-essential-listening-is-optional/comment-page-1/#comment-3577</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Cox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuelyourblogging.com/?p=1405#comment-3577</guid>
		<description>Good point, Lisa. It will be interesting to see if your prediction comes true. Do readers leave when comments are disabled? Glad it&#039;s Engadget experimenting and not me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, Lisa. It will be interesting to see if your prediction comes true. Do readers leave when comments are disabled? Glad it&#8217;s Engadget experimenting and not me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Cox</title>
		<link>http://www.fuelyourblogging.com/conversation-is-essential-listening-is-optional/comment-page-1/#comment-3576</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Cox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuelyourblogging.com/?p=1405#comment-3576</guid>
		<description>Haha, no problem Hal, and excellent story!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, no problem Hal, and excellent story!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara R</title>
		<link>http://www.fuelyourblogging.com/conversation-is-essential-listening-is-optional/comment-page-1/#comment-3567</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuelyourblogging.com/?p=1405#comment-3567</guid>
		<description>Thanks Brandon for sparking this conversation!

I&#039;m still a design student, but I&#039;ve been web designing since about 2000, and I&#039;ve had Internet in my house since BEFORE Windows 3.0 came out. Old fashioned, maybe a little, but I do remember when BBS were the way to go - and the best thing about them? The community!

Here&#039;s my perspective on the whole thing:
Comments on blogs are much like constructive criticism. Sometimes they spark a revolution - but it&#039;s a GREAT way to know what you&#039;re doing right, what you&#039;re doing wrong, and what kind of influential power you have. Best practices from art school would tell you that you should at least LISTEN to what everyone has to say, and then decide what pieces to take with you and which ones to throw away. 

People in the design community keep complaining that we&#039;re moving away from the &quot;community&quot; aspect, but how do you have community without the ability to share links, share your thoughts, and KNOW you&#039;ve made SOME sort of impact? (Even if it&#039;s just an email that says &#039;thanks for joining the conversation!&#039;)

I see the need for comments to be turned off on occasion, but really what I see the need for more is GOOD conversation in comments. One of the forums I subscribe to has a code of conduct rule that basically states &quot;If you have nothing to add to the conversation, don&#039;t reply. If someone&#039;s already said it, don&#039;t re-post it.&quot; Why waste your time (and mine as the reader or author) to write &quot;Nice post!&quot; when another 30 seconds could have developed into &quot;Nice post, but next time please include ________.&quot; Plus, I&#039;ve always just kind&#039;ve hated those &quot;I agree with So-and-So&quot; comments. 

[/steps off soapbox]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Brandon for sparking this conversation!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still a design student, but I&#8217;ve been web designing since about 2000, and I&#8217;ve had Internet in my house since BEFORE Windows 3.0 came out. Old fashioned, maybe a little, but I do remember when BBS were the way to go &#8211; and the best thing about them? The community!</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my perspective on the whole thing:<br />
Comments on blogs are much like constructive criticism. Sometimes they spark a revolution &#8211; but it&#8217;s a GREAT way to know what you&#8217;re doing right, what you&#8217;re doing wrong, and what kind of influential power you have. Best practices from art school would tell you that you should at least LISTEN to what everyone has to say, and then decide what pieces to take with you and which ones to throw away. </p>
<p>People in the design community keep complaining that we&#8217;re moving away from the &#8220;community&#8221; aspect, but how do you have community without the ability to share links, share your thoughts, and KNOW you&#8217;ve made SOME sort of impact? (Even if it&#8217;s just an email that says &#8216;thanks for joining the conversation!&#8217;)</p>
<p>I see the need for comments to be turned off on occasion, but really what I see the need for more is GOOD conversation in comments. One of the forums I subscribe to has a code of conduct rule that basically states &#8220;If you have nothing to add to the conversation, don&#8217;t reply. If someone&#8217;s already said it, don&#8217;t re-post it.&#8221; Why waste your time (and mine as the reader or author) to write &#8220;Nice post!&#8221; when another 30 seconds could have developed into &#8220;Nice post, but next time please include ________.&#8221; Plus, I&#8217;ve always just kind&#8217;ve hated those &#8220;I agree with So-and-So&#8221; comments. </p>
<p>[/steps off soapbox]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lisa kribs</title>
		<link>http://www.fuelyourblogging.com/conversation-is-essential-listening-is-optional/comment-page-1/#comment-3566</link>
		<dc:creator>lisa kribs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuelyourblogging.com/?p=1405#comment-3566</guid>
		<description>Huge kneejerk FAIL by Engadget. 

Digital conversation is what it is today because of just that, the conversation. 

Where would our conversation be with disabled comments? Not on that blog, but somewhere else. Blogging starting out as journaling, sure, but the fake plastic key that unlocked the side of the journal (hiding under the bed, you get the idea...) which allowed you to write all over someone elses pages has almost always been there too. 

This is now a two way street folks. Youtube. The comments are ridiculous on there - why? Because they can be, and it&#039;s allowed. I don&#039;t believe you can take something that back to a purely 1 way trad. style on the web. 

This too shall pass and they&#039;re going to reopen the floor or Engadget is going to lose interest. I know I will! 

Oh the interwebs..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huge kneejerk FAIL by Engadget. </p>
<p>Digital conversation is what it is today because of just that, the conversation. </p>
<p>Where would our conversation be with disabled comments? Not on that blog, but somewhere else. Blogging starting out as journaling, sure, but the fake plastic key that unlocked the side of the journal (hiding under the bed, you get the idea&#8230;) which allowed you to write all over someone elses pages has almost always been there too. </p>
<p>This is now a two way street folks. Youtube. The comments are ridiculous on there &#8211; why? Because they can be, and it&#8217;s allowed. I don&#8217;t believe you can take something that back to a purely 1 way trad. style on the web. </p>
<p>This too shall pass and they&#8217;re going to reopen the floor or Engadget is going to lose interest. I know I will! </p>
<p>Oh the interwebs..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hal Goodtree</title>
		<link>http://www.fuelyourblogging.com/conversation-is-essential-listening-is-optional/comment-page-1/#comment-3564</link>
		<dc:creator>Hal Goodtree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuelyourblogging.com/?p=1405#comment-3564</guid>
		<description>My &quot;blog&quot; is a community newspaper serving a town of 140,000.

We keep our comment stream clean by rigorously enforcing a &quot;no-trolls&quot; policy. Once a culture of politeness takes root, it is jealously protected by the community.

Learned that from John Murden at Church Hill People&#039;s News in Richmond.

Good post Brandon. Thanks for enabling comments :)

- Another Hal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My &#8220;blog&#8221; is a community newspaper serving a town of 140,000.</p>
<p>We keep our comment stream clean by rigorously enforcing a &#8220;no-trolls&#8221; policy. Once a culture of politeness takes root, it is jealously protected by the community.</p>
<p>Learned that from John Murden at Church Hill People&#8217;s News in Richmond.</p>
<p>Good post Brandon. Thanks for enabling comments :)</p>
<p>- Another Hal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Cox</title>
		<link>http://www.fuelyourblogging.com/conversation-is-essential-listening-is-optional/comment-page-1/#comment-3543</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Cox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuelyourblogging.com/?p=1405#comment-3543</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you on the SEO value of blogs over static sites. In fact, I think it&#039;s crazy how many blogger-powered sites rank well for keywords. A Google inside job? Perhaps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you on the SEO value of blogs over static sites. In fact, I think it&#8217;s crazy how many blogger-powered sites rank well for keywords. A Google inside job? Perhaps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

